PVDaddy wrote:...Concept 1: The pole and the vaulter (the vaulter pole system) must continue to move toward the crossbar for a good and safe vault.
What is essential for this to occur? In your observations?
PVDaddy wrote:...Concept 1: The pole and the vaulter (the vaulter pole system) must continue to move toward the crossbar for a good and safe vault.
PVDaddy wrote:Kirt, ...
... "Es pound" ... is the original French word from were we get the English word Expound (Of French origin) My spell checker took me there and I just went with it. ...
... I realize at the bottom of my post, when I was tired, I mistakenly called you "kurt" (No disrespect intended).
PVDaddy wrote:. the spelling of the word "vertical". I believe I had misspelled it as "verticle" at the time (I have not spelled it wrong since. Thank-You). ...
PVDaddy wrote:Do you have any problem with providing further specific critique on my Agenda 21 thread?
PVDaddy wrote:So there it is. Please feel free to bisect it and dissect it. I promise I will not become sensitive or angry to anyone's critique! lol
PVDaddy wrote:My answer is: Everything that has been already mentioned in all of my what you described as diluted, excessive, non-specific posts!
coachjvinson wrote:PVDaddy wrote:...Concept 1: The pole and the vaulter (the vaulter pole system) must continue to move toward the crossbar for a good and safe vault.
What is essential for this to occur? In your observations?
Hi PVD. Our last discussion on PVP was in 2010, and I must say that I'm impressed with your ever-increasing knowledge of PV technique.
I'm not at all impressed with the continual sparring that you're STILL having with Altius - seems like same-old, same-old. But that's between you and him - let's not go there, eh?
Your thoughts re "negative inversion" are almost 100% correct
Like I said, there is no TUCK and there is no PUSH!
I'll save any other comparisons of our taglines for another post - if you agree to keep our discussions amiable
So sorry to burst you bubble re the originality of your "negative inversion" theory
Hi Kirk, It is so nice to here from you again! I remember you well from 2010. How you took so much time to carefully try to explain all the technical details of the whip out of inverted-C to me and also the use of the bottom arm in the vault. I learned a great deal from you. I also learned a great deal from Altius, about the importance of the practical hands on approach of developing simplified training tools for conveying these Petrov methods to others. Thank-you both for your time and energy you have given in trying to educate me! Shortly after our misunderstanding of motives in 2010, I purchased Alan's book and video. I found them both to be very educational and beneficial. A small investment for a wealth of knowledge . I call that putting your money were your brain is. I like to think mine is still open, like the parachute? No charge for that commercial Altius! Only because I think your a likable fellow.
I know that I did not invent "Negative Inversion" and have no Idea who recognized its benefits first? Perhaps it was you back in 1971-1972? The very fact that you were able to get past vertical shows that you were ahead of your time (The fact that you recognized its benefits back then) and probably had a lot to do with your Bryde bend technique?
There's not much point in answering your questions until you've at least read the posts from the searches that I suggested. You'll have to spell my name right to get any hits - "kurt past vertical" won't cut it
I believe that's"Kirk" K-I-R-K!I did not search "kirk past vertical" but plan to.
Yet you have still not learned to use your spell checker effectively - you STILL (occassionally) spell the word "vertical" incorrectly. If you search for "agenda 21 verticle" you'll see when (last month) and where..It also bothers me that you consistently mispell the word "where". You seem to have the habit of omitting the "h". You may think I'm being picky, but besides the credibility issue, it does slow down the reader who's trying to comprehend what you're trying to say. So a reader has to reread those sentences where you're missing the "h" in the word. It interupts the flow of reading, and if you have too many typos per post, people misunderstand what you're trying to say, or just throw their arms up in despair
Your Agenda 21 is a joke. I just glanced through that thread too, because I find it mostly drivel.NO, short of the above comments, I won't be commenting on your Agenda 21 thread.
PVDaddy wrote:Your motive for posting on this thread from the very beginning was never to try to have amiable dialoque, but to disrupt this thread that you are obviously jealous because I took a great concept and expounded on it benefits well beyond what you were ever capable! You are "beyond" obvious! I good term for it " Negative Obvious!"
PVDaddy wrote:... try to have amiable dialoque
John Wooden wrote:Whatever you do in life, surround yourself with smart people who'll argue with you.
altius wrote:Then with regard to “negative inversion”. I believe it is only another term – and possibly a confusing one - for “covering the pole”.
Albert Einstein wrote:"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -
altius wrote:Then with regard to “negative inversion”. I believe it is only another term – and possibly a confusing one - for “covering the pole”.
rainbowgirl28 wrote:Coachjvinson please don't insert the same picture into every post. I don't allow pictures as part of a signature. You're welcome to use them when relevant but three posts in a row is probably a bit much.
Return to “Pole Vault - Advanced Technique”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests