Selection system

News about pole vault competitions that occur outside the US and international pole vaulters.
User avatar
ACvault
PV Pro
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 1:32 pm
Favorite Vaulter: Tim Mack

Selection system

Unread postby ACvault » Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:23 pm

Does anyone think that the U.S. trials system could stand to be changed? I know one suggestion is that the first two finishers would automatically earn an Olympic berth while the third spot would be determined by a U.S. track and field panel. Now believe me, this is no criticism of any vaulters we have every sent to the games, but I have read about how it is unfair to some higher level elite athletes who try to train through the games and be at their best for the Olympics but then get beat by another (and often lesser) athlete who specifically peaks for the trials and then does not perform well in the Olympics. This complaint is most often associated with distance running, examples including Khadevis Robinson and Alan Webb this year. Perhaps we could get some thoughts from elite coaches familiar with the subject?

I personally think it would be good to leave the third spot open for a review, as long as it is determined by an unbiased panel using specific criteria (i.e. international experience, PR's, SB's, etc.).

User avatar
rainbowgirl28
I'm in Charge
Posts: 30435
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:59 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, I coach and officiate as life allows
Lifetime Best: 11'6"
Gender: Female
World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
Favorite Vaulter: Casey Carrigan
Location: A Temperate Island
Contact:

Re: Selection system

Unread postby rainbowgirl28 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:06 pm

It is impossible to have an unbiased panel.

I think the system works just fine. Politics within USATF are a tremendous force, trust me when I say that you do NOT want it left up to someone to decide.

A good example is Tyson Gay in the 200. Any panel would have picked him to run it in Beijing. Would that have been a good idea?

KYLE ELLIS
PV Lover
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:31 am
Expertise: former college vaulter, Current college coach
Lifetime Best: 5.26
Favorite Vaulter: bubka
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Selection system

Unread postby KYLE ELLIS » Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:24 pm

How about an earlier date?? This would give more time to work on relays and to re-peak... And possibly recover from injuries.
On a whole new level 6-20-09

User avatar
ACvault
PV Pro
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 1:32 pm
Favorite Vaulter: Tim Mack

Re: Selection system

Unread postby ACvault » Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:26 pm

I see your point about the impossibility of removing politics from the process, and I do think what we have is a good system, but also one that does not always send the best three people.

I've recently been reading discussions about how to determine the greatest athletes in each respective event. Several people have come up with objective formulas by using factors such as personal best, seasonal best, number of world/olympic teams made and world/olympic medals. But then again that might take away the opportunity for a younger athlete (such as someone coming out of the NCAA) to make the team if he or she claimed third.

I guess because we're so stacked in every event that's just the way it has to be :D

Also, in response to the above poster, weren't the olympics held in the fall at one point?

User avatar
rainbowgirl28
I'm in Charge
Posts: 30435
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:59 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, I coach and officiate as life allows
Lifetime Best: 11'6"
Gender: Female
World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
Favorite Vaulter: Casey Carrigan
Location: A Temperate Island
Contact:

Re: Selection system

Unread postby rainbowgirl28 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:29 pm

ACvault wrote:I see your point about the impossibility of removing politics from the process, and I do think what we have is a good system, but also one that does not always send the best three people.


There is no way to completely accurately predict who will step up and perform the best at the Olympics. The Trials does its best to simulate the Games (similar schedule in terms of number of heats and rest in between). If you can perform well at the Trials, you have performed under as close of situations as we can approximate to the actual meet. If you can't perform there, why should you get to go to the Olympics?

User avatar
BruceFlorman
PV Lover
Posts: 1099
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:14 pm
Location: Back home again in Indiana (for the moment)

Re: Selection system

Unread postby BruceFlorman » Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:56 am

ACvault wrote:Also, in response to the above poster, weren't the olympics held in the fall at one point?

The Sydney games in 2000 were held from September 15th to October 1st - i.e. fall in the northern hemisphere, but spring in the southern. I imagine that if Rio de Janeiro's 2016 bid wins, their schedule will be similar. I assume the US Trials in 2000 were pushed back similarly, but I'm too lazy to look up the dates right now.

User avatar
Pogo Stick
PV Pro
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:42 pm
Expertise: Former "College" Vaulter, Masters Vaulter
Lifetime Best: 4.70/15'5
Favorite Vaulter: Władysław Kozakiewicz
Location: Vancouver, Canada; Split, Croatia
Contact:

Re: Selection system

Unread postby Pogo Stick » Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:34 pm

BruceFlorman wrote:
ACvault wrote:Also, in response to the above poster, weren't the olympics held in the fall at one point?

The Sydney games in 2000 were held from September 15th to October 1st - i.e. fall in the northern hemisphere, but spring in the southern. I imagine that if Rio de Janeiro's 2016 bid wins, their schedule will be similar. I assume the US Trials in 2000 were pushed back similarly, but I'm too lazy to look up the dates right now.


Olympic Games in Seoul '88 started on Sep 17, similar as Sidney. Seoul is not in south hemisphere, but probably local climate is the reason.
-- Pogo

"It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory." W. Edwards Deming

User avatar
nitro
PV Master
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:33 am
Location: TRAINING

Re: Selection system

Unread postby nitro » Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:23 pm

The trials do eliminate people that are not big meet performers which is not someone you want to be at a bigger stage in the Olympics
pain is only temporary victory is forever

User avatar
Rhino
PV Pro
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Selection system

Unread postby Rhino » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:18 pm

Leave the trials alone. They are just games, for crying out loud. Leaving it to bureaucracy would be un-American!

User avatar
joebro391
PV Follower
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:49 am
Expertise: Current College Vaulter (Samford University)
Lifetime Best: 15'6
Favorite Vaulter: Duplantis, Borges, Bubka
Location: Wherever the Competition is
Contact:

Re: Selection system

Unread postby joebro391 » Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:19 pm

i read all the posts and i see that there a bunch of different methods that can be used but...as pole vaulters, can't we all agree that, even with the proper percautions and everything, that this event is still the most unpredictable sport in the world??

i don't know about other sports, but in pole vault, sometimes, s*** happens and you have to cope with it. there are so many more variables in this sport than others that it is practically impossible to eliminate them all. the peaking thing....well i still think walker should've peak for the olympics but, sometimes it just happens. i'm sure walker will come back for the 2012 games, in london and put his thang down hahaha
PR: 15'6 !!PETROV/6.40 MODEL!! http://www.youtube.com/user/joebro391

spaseminars
PV Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Re: Selection system

Unread postby spaseminars » Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:41 pm

I'm not sure that countries that have a "review" based system are any happier with their outcome than those that have a "sudden death" system, and it certainly subjects both athletes and administrators to a lot more headache and heartache. (Texas based marathoner Liza Hunter-Galvan selection by Athletics New Zealand would be a good example of how convoluted this can be.)

Lack of bias and politicing doesn't seem likely, and true objectivity is difficult to the point of impossible. Though the "top three" approach is not without it's faults, it's not subject to second guessing either.

Now - if we could just figure out why athletes do badly when we expect them to do brilliantly, a lot of the issues would be overcome :D

User avatar
gymnastsrock
PV Master
Posts: 657
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:31 pm
Expertise: College Vaulter
Lifetime Best: 11'
Gender: Female
Favorite Vaulter: too hard!
Location: WI

Re: Selection system

Unread postby gymnastsrock » Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:11 pm

Maybe this relates, maybe it doesn't. In Canada, they use a points system to select their Olympic gymnasts. For a poor performance at last year's worlds, they were allowed only 2 girls. One girl (Kristina Vaculik), was very young and had just became a senior in 2007 was cheated out of a spot because she hadn't had enough time to earn points. Even though most everyone agreed she was Canada's best athlete for the job, and was a national champion, she finished 3rd in the points and had her Beijing dreams dashed. I guess the point is that even a formula of some sort doesn't always work the way it was planned to.
When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao Tzu


Return to “Pole Vault - International”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests