PP, if there's already a thread started about this device, it would be helpful if you could provide the link. I searched for various combinations of "Cata", "Vault", "sport" and "tec", and I came up dry.

- Cata-Vault pic.JPG (29.93 KiB) Viewed 3925 times
At first glance, one might think that this device truly simulates an actual vault. On their website, SportTec make this claim ...
THE CATA-VAULT IS THE ULTIMATE POLE VAULT TRAINING SYSTEM!!
... By propelling the athlete at their normal runway speed the Cata-Vault is an exact simulation of an actual Vault.
Just by observing the vid and still pics, I can see that these claims are just marketing hyperbole.
In the pic above, the vaulter APPEARS to have a really nice SPLIT position, then swings to a parital invert (but flagging out), clearing the bar.
However, if you look closer, you will see that:
1. The vaulter is NOT being propelled "at his normal runway speed". At the start of the drill, he's simply standing on an elevated platform, without any means of bending the pole in the way you would by your "normal runway speed". Being PULLED by the device does NOT simulate the momentum you get from your run and takeoff!
2. The vaulter is way too high above his takeoff point. You will NEVER be in this body posture on a real vault, that high up in the air!
3. For the entire duration of the drill, the pole is PULLING the vaulter up and over the bar - not much different than you would use your fiberglass rod to cast your line in fly fishing!

This is the opposite of what happens in a real vault. In a real vault, the first phase after the vaulter leaves the ground, the vaulter is TRANSFERRING ENERGY INTO THE POLE (thru mostly the top hand). In the SECOND phase of the vault (roughly after the vaulter passes the chord and has already begun inverting), the pole transfers this energy back, "pulling" the vaulter up - STRAIGHT UP. There's a world of difference between these two!
4. I'm not quite sure how the device simulates the transition of the twisting motion of the pole from a FORWARDS bend (towards the pit) to a SIDEWAYS bend (towards one of the standards). The details aren't shown or explained, so I don't know how the vaulter would get "around" the pole if it doesn't twist to the side like a real pole. It seems to me that if the device is PULLING the vaulter, a direct FORWARDS bend will persist.
Since the inventor's premise (presumably) is that the potential energy stored in the battery of the device represents the potential energy stored in the pole during a vault, this drill should ONLY simulate the 2nd phase of the vault (the swing/extension phase after the vaulter passes the chord).
To accomplish this, the device would have to somehow allow the vaulter get into this position on the pole, ALONG WITH HAVING THE MOMENTUM THAT HE HAS TO GET TO THAT POSITION. Unless those 2 prerequisites are solved, this device is far from "an exact simulation of an actual Vault". IMHO, it's futile to think that this can be achieved.
In my previous post, I had suggested that it's an innovative device that I would try, just for the fun of it. However, in reading their online literature more carefully, they're not marketing this as something you'd just play around with on a Sunday afternoon, just for fun. They're marketing it as "THE ULTIMATE PV TRAINING SYSTEM". That's very misleading - to the point of false adverstising!
PV training is all about putting your time and energy into the drills that give you the most bang for the buck. This isn't one of them. In fact, if MONEY is an additional factor, then I doubt that this device makes it into any HS or college program.
To be fair, the vid suggests that it's a useful "rehab" training device. I will at least concede that if you're unable to run down the runway, this could at least keep you active - but not any better than swinging on rings or highbar ... or POOL VAULTING

... in terms of actual vault simulation!
Kirk