PVDaddy wrote:Kirt, ...
... "Es pound" ... is the original French word from were we get the English word Expound (Of French origin) My spell checker took me there and I just went with it. ...
... I realize at the bottom of my post, when I was tired, I mistakenly called you "kurt" (No disrespect intended).
My name is spelled K-I-R-K. KIRK.
I thought I could ask you (in a kind, nonconfrontational way) to spell my name correctly by simply telling you that any searches for my posts won't work if you mispell my name. I fully expected a small apology so that we could move on to more important topics. But (as usual), you contorted this out of proportion, by defending your two occurrences of spelling my name properly, and explaining away your two mispellings of my name by saying that you were "tired".
Then - as if that wasn't enough - you added insult to injury by mispelling my name YET AGAIN in your SECOND reply. If that's not disrespectful (your word - not mine), I don't know what is. Geez!
Then you continued your excuses by defending your spelling of the word "expound" as being the word suggested by your spell checker.
And then ...
PVDaddy wrote:. the spelling of the word "vertical". I believe I had misspelled it as "verticle" at the time (I have not spelled it wrong since. Thank-You). ...
Yet you have still not learned to use your spell checker effectively - you STILL (occassionally) spell the word "vertical" incorrectly. If you search for "agenda 21 verticle" you'll see when (last month) and where.
It also bothers me that you consistently mispell the word "where". You seem to have the habit of omitting the "h". You may think I'm being picky, but besides the credibility issue, it does slow down the reader who's trying to comprehend what you're trying to say. So a reader has to reread those sentences where you're missing the "h" in the word. It interupts the flow of reading, and if you have too many typos per post, people misunderstand what you're trying to say, or just throw their arms up in despair.
PVDaddy wrote:Do you have any problem with providing further specific critique on my Agenda 21 thread?
If you want to improve your credibility in proposing novel ways of flying over 21 feet, you have to at least strive to spell people's names and key words correctly - otherwise your credibility is diminished, and any good ideas will be lost in your rants. Most of us don't have time to sift through all of your chaff to find any seeds of wisdom. Especially if the rants are pointed at them. I sure don't have the time or patience for such rants.
Your Agenda 21 is a joke. Your first thread was locked because of your off-topic rants. Your second (draft) thread seemed to go nowhere (I just glanced at it, since it was only a draft and you'd already posted your "final" version. Your third (final draft) thread wasn't anywhere near final, so I don't know why you called it that. After your initial post, you made 7 more posts that seemed to be amendments or clarifications to your first post! I just glanced through that thread too, because I find it mostly drivel.
I really question why you're posting in the Advanced Technique forum. By your own admission, you're not qualified to do so, yet you continue. Geez!
PVDaddy wrote:So there it is. Please feel free to bisect it and dissect it. I promise I will not become sensitive or angry to anyone's critique! lol
Your pattern of behavior is that you WILL become sensitive or angry to anyone's critique - whether justified or not. Most of the time your rants are unjustified. You will cling to one small tidbit of truth in your post, arguing on its merits and ignoring the overall point being made to you. You did that with me re the spelling of my name, and the spelling of the word "expound" - so I rest my case.
NO, short of the above comments, I won't be commenting on your Agenda 21 thread.
Kirk Bryde