rainbowgirl28 wrote:Vaultref, why was the 5-alive system not used during the finals at NCAAs?
I can see that the start list says no five-alive, but why? I can understand not using it in prelims, but it didn't make any sense in finals. At least it wasn't cold outside, but those girls had to wait awhile between jumps at 4.15.
We don't know why Becca, it caught us by surprise. At the pre-meet VJ officials meeting, we were told that the meet management/NCAA groundrules was to not do 5-alive at any time. If I had to guess, I think they didn't expect to have more than 12 in the finals in either of the VJ events.
For the mens PV final, it did not matter as there was never more than 8 at a height.
But for the women as you noted, with 16 entered they did have to wait for that second jump turn to come around.
Another meet management/NCAA item slowed things down a bit. Maybe you noticed. We were instructed to wait until the althletes name was on the field-lynx board before the cone would be removed from the runway.
There was someone turing the board, so it's not always visible.
At least a half dozen times during the women's event, the wait was becoming excessive, so I just pulled the cone anyway. I could see the vaulter was just raring start the attempt. I'm sure the name was probably on the board but since it couldn't been seen by the pit personal, we relied on a thumbs up signal from plam guy at the head of the runway. Distractions delayed that a few times not to mention the shotput people in front of this display board.
We believe this "name on board first" requirement was done because solely for TV purposes.
That field-lynx board positioning for the mens event was better and I don't think the delays there were as noticeable but they were there.