Better not NH at Regionals!!
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 3:39 pm
I was reading my latest issue of Track and Field News and noticed this about Regionals...
"Unlike last year, when the rest of the field was filled from the yearly list, so long as the athlete had competed at Regionals, this year, the next 3 placers in each Regional go into an at-large pool of a dozen per event. That placers' list is ordered based on yearly bests."
This sucks for the high jump and pole vault where a NH at Regionals can now eliminate your chances of making it to Nationals.
This also sucks for people from the West Region which has been ridiculously deep compared to the other 3. I think most of the at-large berths have gone to people from that region in the past.
"Unlike last year, when the rest of the field was filled from the yearly list, so long as the athlete had competed at Regionals, this year, the next 3 placers in each Regional go into an at-large pool of a dozen per event. That placers' list is ordered based on yearly bests."
This sucks for the high jump and pole vault where a NH at Regionals can now eliminate your chances of making it to Nationals.
This also sucks for people from the West Region which has been ridiculously deep compared to the other 3. I think most of the at-large berths have gone to people from that region in the past.