PoleVaultPower.com

It would be best for all to not bring up old rules or what might have been old rules to determine the the places. It only matters what it is today. I still hear young athletes say they really thought you go back to the previous height to determine who won or placed heigher. Don't know where they ha...

vault3rb0y wrote: They were measuring the 17'7" after each jump too, not just setting the standards and leaving it. Hopefully this year a lot of that is cleared up.

I know it's a pain, but I thought they had to measure before each attempt if it is a record attempt?

"Plan to have it read over the weekend." Trust you are a fast reader!!! :yes: No, I've never been a speed reader. That's read # 1--the excitement read. Read #2 takes a little more time to fully comprehend what you are reading and how to apply it. I told my wife how excited I was to read i...

Just got mine today--thanks Sean Brown & Neovault! Plan to have it read over the weekend.

I have since received my approval & certificate of insurance.

I'm with you, Ashcraft. I thought it was a good move in terms of going for the win.

Looked like the top 3 all had some great height, just needed some fine tuning in determining standard placement.

Hooker's jump looked pretty good. Standards just a little too deep.
I love how the awards presentations are more important to show than the actual competitions, especially the top 2 men in the PV!

jcoover wrote:

mjaubbs40 wrote:

jcoover wrote:yep got it back... too bad we missed lukyanenko's clearance at 585

mine is still out. can you send me a link please?

try closing your browser and opening it all again...

that worked. Thanks

jcoover wrote:yep got it back... too bad we missed lukyanenko's clearance at 585

mine is still out. can you send me a link please?

yup. thought it was me. maybe they caught on that we were watching for free?

They just showed Evgeniy Lukyanenko's 1st attempt miss at 5.85m. A young russian not using the petrov method? Blasphemy???